NYSEARCA:RYLD – The 12% Dividend Machine or a Yield Trap Ready to Collapse?

NYSEARCA:RYLD – Is the 12% Yield Sustainable or a Value Trap?

The Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (NYSEARCA:RYLD) continues to attract income-focused investors with its staggering 12.3% dividend yield, making it one of the highest-yielding funds in the covered call ETF space. The fund’s ability to generate consistent monthly distributions makes it appealing, but its long-term performance has been a point of debate. With interest rates still near multi-decade highs and small-cap stocks struggling to gain traction, the key question is whether RYLD is a buy, hold, or a potential yield trap waiting to implode.

RYLD’s Dividend Yield Nears Peak Levels – What’s Driving It?

RYLD’s primary appeal is its exceptionally high yield, currently sitting at 12.3%, which is nearly double its historical average of 6.3%. Since its inception in 2019, the fund’s dividend yield has typically fluctuated between 4% and 12%, making the current level one of the highest in its history.

The fund generates income by selling at-the-money (ATM) covered call options on the Russell 2000 Index, collecting premiums that fund its monthly dividend payouts. The attractiveness of this yield largely depends on the implied volatility (IV) of the Russell 2000. Higher IV means higher premiums from call options, translating to stronger cash flow for distributions.

Currently, the IV of the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM), which tracks the same index, is in the 87th percentile of the past year, meaning it has rarely been this elevated. This supports higher option premiums, sustaining RYLD’s payout. However, if market volatility drops, these premiums will shrink, potentially reducing dividend payments.

Is RYLD’s 12%+ Yield Sustainable in 2025?

The sustainability of RYLD’s double-digit yield depends on multiple factors, the most important being the volatility of the Russell 2000 index, interest rate policy, and fund structure.

1. Implied Volatility: The Key Driver of Income Generation
   Covered call ETFs like RYLD thrive in markets where volatility is elevated but not extreme. The current IV of the Russell 2000 is at 23.9, well above the yearly average, meaning the options sold by RYLD generate higher premiums. As long as this remains the case, the fund should maintain its dividend levels. However, if volatility drops or the market stabilizes, the income from call options will shrink, putting downward pressure on distributions.

2. Interest Rates & Small-Cap Performance
   Small-cap stocks have struggled in the current high-interest rate environment, as these companies tend to carry more debt and rely heavily on financing for growth. If the Federal Reserve cuts rates in 2025, it could provide a tailwind for small-cap stocks, improving total returns for RYLD. However, a strong rate-cut cycle could lower volatility, which would negatively impact RYLD’s option premium income.

3. Expense Ratio & Long-Term Performance
   RYLD’s expense ratio is 0.60%, significantly higher than IWM’s 0.19% or IJR’s 0.06%. This high fee structure can erode long-term returns, particularly for buy-and-hold investors. Despite its strong income profile, RYLD’s total return has significantly lagged the Russell 2000, with IWM delivering a 52.01% return over the past five years, while RYLD only returned 26.29%.

The Covered Call Strategy – How Does It Affect Returns?

RYLD’s covered call strategy is designed for high income, not growth. By selling ATM call options, the fund limits its upside potential, making it less attractive during bull markets.

• In Choppy or Declining Markets: RYLD outperforms due to its strong income generation. If small-cap stocks remain range-bound, the fund should continue to deliver solid returns through its monthly payouts.
• In Strong Bull Markets: RYLD will underperform significantly, as the fund is forced to cap gains in exchange for premium income. Investors looking for long-term capital appreciation may be better off in an uncovered small-cap ETF like IWM or RYLG, which provides more growth potential.

The ATM option approach also contrasts with out-of-the-money (OTM) strategies, which allow for greater upside participation. Funds like IWMW (iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF) use OTM strategies, offering a balance between income and price appreciation, making them a compelling alternative to RYLD.

Interest Rate Cuts – A Potential Catalyst for RYLD?

The Federal Reserve’s stance on rate cuts in 2025 remains a key wildcard. Initially, four cuts were expected, but projections have since dropped to only two expected cuts in 2025.

• If rates are cut aggressively, small-cap stocks could rally as borrowing costs decrease, increasing RYLD’s total return potential. However, this could reduce implied volatility, leading to lower call premiums and weaker dividend payouts.
• If the Fed delays or minimizes cuts, small caps could continue to struggle, but volatility could remain elevated, allowing RYLD to sustain its high payout levels.

Historical data shows that RYLD performed exceptionally well during the low-rate period of 2020-2021, appreciating nearly 50%, as small-cap stocks surged on cheap financing. A similar environment in 2025 could provide a strong tailwind for RYLD investors.

How Does RYLD Compare to Other High-Yield ETFs?

Given RYLD’s unique approach, it’s essential to compare it against similar funds.

• IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) offers a much higher 52% dividend yield but has underperformed significantly in terms of total returns.
• IWMW (iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF) follows an OTM strategy, offering a higher yield (19%) while still allowing for some capital appreciation, making it a better fit for investors seeking a balance of growth and income.
• IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) also utilizes an ATM approach but yields 14.7%, slightly higher than RYLD.

RYLD’s more conservative yield strategy means lower risk of NAV deterioration over time, making it more stable compared to higher-yielding but volatile counterparts.

Dividend History – Can RYLD Keep Paying 12%+?

RYLD has historically funded 100% of its distributions through return of capital (ROC), which helps reduce tax liabilities but also eats into NAV over time.

• The most recent dividend was $0.17 per share, keeping the annualized yield near 12%.
• ROC distributions allow investors to benefit from lower taxable income, making RYLD an attractive pick for taxable accounts.
• The sustainability of these payouts depends on call premium income, meaning any prolonged volatility drop could force dividend cuts.

Historical backtests of RYLD’s annual dividend income show significant fluctuations:

• 2020: $2,516
• 2021: $3,517 (peak payout during strong small-cap rally)
• 2022: $3,335
• 2023: $3,137
• 2024: $3,290

Final Verdict – Is RYLD a Buy, Hold, or Sell?

With interest rates still high, volatility elevated, and small caps trading sideways, RYLD remains an attractive income-generating ETF. The 12%+ yield is sustainable in the short term, but if volatility falls, the payout could shrink.

For investors looking for reliable monthly income, RYLD is a strong buy under current conditions. However, long-term growth investors should consider alternatives like IWM, IWMW, or RYLG, which provide better upside potential.

At current levels, RYLD offers a unique risk/reward profile, making it an ideal holding in income-focused portfolios while small-cap stocks remain stagnant. For now, RYLD remains a buy, but future rate cuts and volatility shifts will dictate its long-term viability.

That's TradingNEWS